Like every other website on the planet, SmallNetBuilder uses cookies. Our cookies track login status, but we only allow admins to log in anyway, so those don't apply to you. Any other cookies you pick up during your visit come from advertisers, which we don't control.
If you continue to use the site, you agree to tolerate our use of cookies. Thank you!

Router Charts

Click for Router Charts

Router Ranker

Click for Router Ranker

NAS Charts

Click for NAS Charts

NAS Ranker

Click for NAS Ranker

More Tools

Click for More Tools

NAS Reviews


As noted above, the TS-112P runs QNAP's QTS 4.1 NAS OS (4.1.2 to be specific) and supports all its features, except those precluded by its reduced hardware configuration, i.e. no RAID, no video playback via HDMI, etc.

QNAP QTS Desktop

QNAP QTS Desktop

I counted 122 apps in the 112P's App center out of the 198 shown in the online App Center. The first 28 are shown below and the others are in the gallery you'll find a bit further down the page.

Some of the TS-112P supported apps

Some of the TS-112P supported apps

While this list is impressive, keep in mind the relatively low CPU power provided by the Marvell Kirkwood class SoC. I'm sure it will cause some of these apps to absolutely crawl.

Since it's been awhile since I reviewed single drive NASes, I had to readjust my expectations for response time when moving through the admin interface. The QTS desktop seemed to demand more from the Marvell processor than it was prepared to give.


Performance tests were run using our Revision 5 NAS test process on a single-drive volume with a 1 Gbps LAN connection. The firmware installed was QTS 4.1.2.

The TS-112P's Benchmark Summary below shows an almost 2-to-1 difference between the Windows and NASPT File copy write results, while reads are about the same. I'm not sure what caused this.

Benchmark Summary comparison

Benchmark Summary comparison

I included the DS115j's summary for easy comparison. It's clear the Synology does better than the 112P in many benchmarks, especially when it comes to large sequential file handling, as indicated by the File Copy and HD playback benches.

Since the DS115j review, we also reviewed Seagate's Personal Cloud. So with three single-drive NASes in the database, we now have something to rank! The NAS Ranker Performance Summary below shows #2 rankings for many of the benchmarks. Keep in mind when checking the rankings against the Benchmark Summaries above, that the Ranker treats values within 5% as equal. So some of the sub-rankings are ties, but aren't shown as such in the summary.

QNAP TS-112P Ranker Performance Summary

QNAP TS-112P Ranker Performance Summary

Closing Thoughts

So now we can answer the Synology DS115j vs. QNAP TS-112P question. If USB 3.0 and eSATA ports are important to you, you have only one choice, the TS-112P. But for overall performance, the edge goes to Synology's DS115j. Only you can answer whether you'd rather spend the extra $10 or keep it in your pocket.

More NAS

Wi-Fi System Tools
Check out our Wi-Fi System Charts, Ranker and Finder!

Support Us!

If you like what we do and want to thank us, just buy something on Amazon. We'll get a small commission on anything you buy. Thanks!

Over In The Forums

Hello. After updating to the latest _18 firmware, I could no longer pull my full gigabit wan to lan. It seems to cap out around 620-650. This is with ...
Asuswrt-Merlin 384.19 beta is now available (except for the RT-AX56U which won't be available for this release, due to outdated GPL code).Aug 9th: Bet...
UPDATED 11/7/2020 Skynet - Router Firewall & Security Enhancements Skynet is the first comprehensive IP banning and security tool exclusively fo...
This is FlexQoS, a fork of the original, groundbreaking FreshJR_QOS script written by @FreshJR.FlexQoS provides a fully customizable Adaptive QoS expe...

Don't Miss These

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3