Introduction
In Part 1 of this NTK, I gave an overview of the state of 802.11g development, described the key performance related issues, and offered some advice for prospective purchasers of these not-quite-ready-for-prime-time products.
In this second, and final part of the NTK, I'll go into more detail on the performance differences that you'll find between current Linksys and Buffalo Tech products. I'll also present the results of my first detailed performance tests for products based on Intersil's PRISM GT chipset.
Related Articles
-
NETGEAR WG602 54Mbps Wireless Access Point Review
- Linksys WAP54G Instant Wireless-G Access Point reviewed
Support Us!
If you like what we do and want to thank us, just buy something on Amazon. We'll get a small commission on anything you buy. Thanks!Don't Miss These
-
Wi-Fi 6 Performance Roundup: Five Routers Tested
Read More
We take a look at how five Wi-Fi 6 routers perform with a Wi-Fi 6 client. -
First Peek At Wi-Fi 6: ASUS RT-AX88U & NETGEAR RAX80
Read More
Updated - Our first look at the performance of NETGEAR's RAX80 and ASUS' RT-AX88U shows little benefit functioning as AC routers. -
160 MHz Wi-Fi Channels: Friend or Foe?
Read More
Updated - 160 MHz channel bandwidth is an essential feature of 802.11ax. We take a look at whether it means trouble for your 11ac network. -
Wi-Fi Roaming Secrets Revealed
Read More
Ever wonder what happens behind the scenes when Wi-Fi devices roam, or more likely don't? We'll show you why the "seamless" roaming Wi-Fi gear makers promise is still as elusive as a Yeti.
- 1
- 2
› ‹ - Linksys WAP54G Instant Wireless-G Access Point reviewed