Like every other website on the planet, SmallNetBuilder uses cookies. Our cookies track login status, but we only allow admins to log in anyway, so those don't apply to you. Any other cookies you pick up during your visit come from advertisers, which we don't control.
If you continue to use the site, you agree to tolerate our use of cookies. Thank you!

Router Charts

Click for Router Charts

Router Ranker

Click for Router Ranker

NAS Charts

Click for NAS Charts

NAS Ranker

Click for NAS Ranker

More Tools

Click for More Tools

Wireless Reviews

Super G Turbo vs. ACE, Continued

But what happens when the legacy WLAN is parked on Channel 6? According to Airgo, both its and all 11n products won't be able to "tune away" from this situation. The reason has to do with fundamental design decisions that were made long ago with regard to the technology to be used in 802.11n, that resulted in the requirement for 40MHz of contiguous band. The result is that the Primary and Secondary channels for 802.11n 2.4GHz band operation will always be separated by four channels, i.e. 1P + 5S, 8P + 4S, 11P + 7S, etc.

This means that even with an 802.11n WLAN channel forced to 1 or 11, there will be enough channel overlap from the 40MHz of occupied bandwidth to pretty much slow a legacy WLAN on channel 6 to a crawl, i.e. a few Mbps of throughput.

To confirm this, I ran my throughput test forcing the RM240 to Channel 1 (with the secondary set to channel 5) and leaving the 11g WLAN set to Channel 6. The result shown in Figure 29 is typical of performance I observed using either the original or patched firmware from Airgo.

Neighboring WLAN downlink - original firmware 11g WLAN Ch 6, RM240 WLAN Ch 1+5

Figure 29: Neighboring WLAN downlink - original firmware
11g WLAN Ch 6, RM240 WLAN Ch 1+5
(click on image to enlarge)

When you compare it with Figure 23, which is the test with both the RM240 and neighboring WLAN occupying Channel 6, things don't look look that much different, i.e. the 802.11g WLAN's throughput gets hammered pretty badly.

Of course, ACE (and all 802.11n gear) has effectively only one non-overlapping 2.4GHz band channel to play with while occupying a 40MHz bandwidth. So in order to not interfere with multiple neighboring legacy 2.4GHz WLANs, 11n gear will need to drop back to using only a single 20MHz channel. This, of course, will also drop its throughput by about half!

So I expect that 802.11n gear will be designed so that it takes its sweet time in deciding whether it is really hearing an adjacent legacy wireless LAN, or just a microwave, cordless phone or other 2.4GHz noise source that it doesn't have to pay attention to.

By the way, in all of my testing, I never once saw the RM240 drop back to occupying a single 20MHz channel.

More Wireless

Wi-Fi System Tools
Check out our Wi-Fi System Charts, Ranker and Finder!

Support Us!

If you like what we do and want to thank us, just buy something on Amazon. We'll get a small commission on anything you buy. Thanks!

Over In The Forums

Hi There,Update 2020/09/11 386 rc2-5 ( lo...
Been a lurker for a while, joined to ask for advice/help. There's a lot ofOver the years I've been committing my old routers to AP duties as I have mo...
Hey,Is it possible to use a wireless backhaul on this system when both xt8 are configured as Ap and connected to the router of the iptv ISP?Thanks for...
HiI have first tried getting support from Asus, but that is like getting blood out of a stone!My new Asus router just will not connect to a web browse...

Don't Miss These

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3