Like every other website on the planet, SmallNetBuilder uses cookies. Our cookies track login status, but we only allow admins to log in anyway, so those don't apply to you. Any other cookies you pick up during your visit come from advertisers, which we don't control.
If you continue to use the site, you agree to tolerate our use of cookies. Thank you!

Router Charts

Click for Router Charts

Router Ranker

Click for Router Ranker

NAS Charts

Click for NAS Charts

NAS Ranker

Click for NAS Ranker

More Tools

Click for More Tools

Wireless Reviews

Amped was surprised by my previous findings that the R10000G performed poorly in Location F. So I agreed to retest another sample that they provided. I retested only Location F in 20 MHz and 40 MHz bandwidth modes with the router set to Channel 1 and the router and Intel Centrino Ultimate-N 6300 test client connected via a WPA2/AES secured connection. These are the same standard conditions used in the original test.

The updated throughput ranking in Figure 1 shows a lower total average downlink throughput for the R10000G (53.3 Mbps vs. 70.7 Mbps). Uplink results also were reduced to 48.9 Mbps from 65.2 Mbps.

Average 2.4 GHz Downlink Throughput ranking - 2.4 GHz only routers - Location F retest results
Figure 1: Average 2.4 GHz Downlink Throughput ranking - 2.4 GHz only routers - Location F retest results

These results reflects the fact that I was able to run IxChariot tests in Location F in the 20 MHz mode.The low throughputs I obtained, however, brought down the total average across all measured locations.

I also ran tests in 40 MHz bandwidth mode in Location F, but could not get the client to connect to the router. This contrasts with my previous results, where the client was able to connect, but not ping or start the IxChariot test.

The updated Performance Table in Figure 2 shows the very low throughput that I managed to obtain in Location F in 20 MHz bandwidth mode and the continued lack of results in 40 MHz bandwidth mode. I kept the comparison products the same, i.e. Buffalo's WZR-HP-G300NH, Ubiquiti's PowerAP N and TP-Link's TL-WR1043ND,

Wireless Performance Comparison - retest
Figure 2: Wireless Performance Comparison - retest

Figure 3 shows the 20 MHz mode Location F downlink IxChariot plot, which shows how unstable the connection was.

R10000G Location F 20 MHz mode downlink retest
Figure 3: R10000G Location F 20 MHz mode downlink retest

Figure 4 shows similar results for uplink. I reran both tests a few times and obtained similar results each time.

R10000G Location F 20 MHz mode downlink retest
Figure 4: R10000G Location F 20 MHz mode uplink retest

Closing Thoughts

The retest results do nothing to alter my original conclusion. The performance of the Amped Wireless R10000G is still impressive, both for routing and wireless, setting new highs by a long shot on several benchmarks. But the data also still doesn't support Amped's claims of "extreme range" wireless coverage.

More Wireless

Wi-Fi System Tools
Check out our Wi-Fi System Charts, Ranker and Finder!

Support Us!

If you like what we do and want to thank us, just buy something on Amazon. We'll get a small commission on anything you buy. Thanks!

Over In The Forums

A feature request to Asuswrt-Merlin branchI've got an rt-ac86u operating in AP-mode behind a firewall. It would be nice to be able to take advantage o...
Hi Does anyone know of any better firmware orif Merlin intends to release firmware for this modem?Thanks
I just upgraded by Xfinity internet service from 60 Mbps to 400 Mbps. A direct connection to my Motorola SB8600 cable modem can achieve more than 400 ...
When it happens I can still ping everything connected to the node just fine from behind the master AP. Everything on the node still has internet. But,...
AX3000 Dual Band PCI-E WiFi 6 (802.11ax) Adapter with 2 external antennas. Supporting 160MHz, Bluetooth 5.0, WPA3 network security, OFDMA and MU-MIMO ...

Don't Miss These

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3