Like every other website on the planet, SmallNetBuilder uses cookies. Our cookies track login status, but we only allow admins to log in anyway, so those don't apply to you. Any other cookies you pick up during your visit come from advertisers, which we don't control.
If you continue to use the site, you agree to tolerate our use of cookies. Thank you!

Router Charts

Click for Router Charts

Router Ranker

Click for Router Ranker

NAS Charts

Click for NAS Charts

NAS Ranker

Click for NAS Ranker

More Tools

Click for More Tools

Wireless Reviews

Wireless Performance - Comparative - more

Looking at the variation among the four test runs provides some insight into overall performance. The 2.4 GHz downlink plot shows that the 0° orientation run (bolded) was entered into the Charts. Note the throughput holds steady until mid-range where it starts to drop, with the intial small drop in throughput.

Four test runs - 2.4 GHz downlink - Ubiquiti UAP-AC

Four test runs - 2.4 GHz downlink - Ubiquiti UAP-AC

The 2.4 GHz uplink plots show better behavior. The 0° plot that was comparable with strong signals was also one of the best at lower signal levels.

Four test runs - 2.4 GHz uplink - Ubiquiti UAP-AC

Four test runs - 2.4 GHz uplink - Ubiquiti UAP-AC

The 5 GHz test runs were also easy to choose the best plots from, which this time turned out to be at the 180° orientation for downlink.

Four test runs - 5 GHz downlink - Ubiquiti UAP-AC

Four test runs - 5 GHz downlink - Ubiquiti UAP-AC

And the same for uplink.

Four test runs - 5 GHz uplink - Ubiquiti UAP-AC

Four test runs - 5 GHz uplink - Ubiquiti UAP-AC

Closing Thoughts

2.4 GHz performance for the UAP-AC was comparable with AC1750 routers we have tested. But 5 GHz performance suffered from both lower peak throughput and shorter range as well.

Compared to other access points and AC1750 routers, at $300, the UAP-AC is expensive. The runs contrary to Ubiquiti's general hardware pricing, which tends to be very competitive. But as one of the few draft 11ac APs available, perhaps Ubiquiti is just trying to get while the gettin' is good.

The UAP-AC's hardware is only part of the story, however. The UniFi 3.0 Wi-Fi Platform may make a more compelling case.

More Wireless

Wi-Fi System Tools
Check out our Wi-Fi System Charts, Ranker and Finder!

Support Us!

If you like what we do and want to thank us, just buy something on Amazon. We'll get a small commission on anything you buy. Thanks!

Over In The Forums

Hello, I recently moved into a new house and had the internet set up by Cox. I would like to extend wired internet to the upstairs rooms but don't wan...
is this working for anyone? It remains blank for me and when I try to refresh it says "undefined" to the right of the client drop down menu.I found ol...
RT AC68WFW Merlin 384.13I have a 4TB drive. I've partitioned it so the first partition is 500GB and the second partition is 3.5TB. The labels for each...
I have a couple of RT-AC68Us (orig T-Mo CellSpots) which are running Merlin 384.13. Couple of months ago I OC'ed them to 1000,800. I now find that the...
Hi,I have an Asus AC-RT68R running Merlin FW 384.13 and I noticed a strange issue with a wired security camera I just installed. It is showing up in t...

Don't Miss These

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3