Like every other website on the planet, SmallNetBuilder uses cookies. Our cookies track login status, but we only allow admins to log in anyway, so those don't apply to you. Any other cookies you pick up during your visit come from advertisers, which we don't control.
If you continue to use the site, you agree to tolerate our use of cookies. Thank you!

Router Charts

Click for Router Charts

Router Ranker

Click for Router Ranker

NAS Charts

Click for NAS Charts

NAS Ranker

Click for NAS Ranker

More Tools

Click for More Tools

Wireless Reviews


I used our new test process, which is also used for testing wireless adapters, to test the WNCE4004 and to retest the ASUS EA-N66. The bridge had its original v1.0.0.32 firmware loaded. There have been no updates. The bridge was placed so that its front side (indicator side) faced the test chamber antennas, which were 8" away. The ASUS RT-AC66U reference router was set to Channel 153 and Auto 20/40/80 MHz bandwidth mode for 5 GHz tests and Channel 6 and 20 MHz bandwidth mode for the 2.4 GHz band run.

The Benchmark Summary shows the averages of all the measurements made in both directions. 2.4 GHz up and downlink results are balanced pretty well. But 5 GHz uplink looks like the WNCE4004's weak spot.

Benchmark Summary

Benchmark Summary

For the throughput vs. attenuation profile plots, I've pulled in the ASUS EA-N66. So this is an N900 vs. N900 bridge comparison. First 2.4 GHz downlink. The ASUS starts with a bit of an edge in the lower attenuations (higher signal levels), but falls off more quickly. Advantage here goes to the NETGEAR.

2.4 GHz downlink throughput vs. attenuation

2.4 GHz downlink throughput vs. attenuation

Same thing happens on 2.4 GHz uplink. Advantage again, NETGEAR.

2.4 uplink throughput vs. attenuation

2.4 GHz uplink throughput vs. attenuation

The NETGEAR's advantage doesn't carry through to the 5 GHz band, unfortunately. The ASUS' strong signal throughput is almost 2X the NETGEAR's. The only good thing for the WNCE4004 is that it does a bit better at the higher attenuations (lower signal levels).

5GHz downlink throughput vs. attenuation

5 GHz downlink throughput vs. attenuation

The result for 5 GHz uplink is similar, except this time the ASUS' initial throughput is 4X higher! It seems that something was preventing the NETGEAR from accessing the higher link rates it needed to achieve the ASUS' higher throughputs.

5 uplink throughput vs. attenuation

5 GHz uplink throughput vs. attenuation

Closing Thoughts

The choice between the NETGEAR WNCE4004 and ASUS EA-N66 is clear, depending on your needs. If low cost, good 2.4 GHz performance and connecting multiple devices are your priorities, go for the NETGEAR. If 5 GHz performance is your primary concern and you'd like the option to repurpose your purchase as an access point or repeater, then put the ASUS in your shopping cart.

More Wireless

Wi-Fi System Tools
Check out our Wi-Fi System Charts, Ranker and Finder!

Support Us!

If you like what we do and want to thank us, just buy something on Amazon. We'll get a small commission on anything you buy. Thanks!

Over In The Forums

I am trying to forward ports 6881 to 6890 for Deluge torrent client, but despite the settings being correct as far as I can tell, for both the Asus ro...
Hi Guys,I just added RT-AC68U as a node to AC5300 and as i understand 5Gz-2 (2nd 5gz band) is used for AiMesh.Is there a way to dedicate 1st one to Ai...
It seems I’m having streaming issues with YouTubeTV with all my devices after upgrading to 9107Netflix doesn’t seem to be an issue.Speed tests still c...
Hi everyone,I am copying some files from my win10 pc to my synology NAS, file speeds are about a dismal 2MB/s, they used to be about 80MB/s.Is there a...
I am trying to connect to a VPN using the OpenVPN/UDP protocol. I want to use UDP port 8080 (VPN provider advised me to do so) but connecting to the s...

Don't Miss These

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3