Like every other website on the planet, SmallNetBuilder uses cookies. Our cookies track login status, but we only allow admins to log in anyway, so those don't apply to you. Any other cookies you pick up during your visit come from advertisers, which we don't control.
If you continue to use the site, you agree to tolerate our use of cookies. Thank you!

Router Charts

Click for Router Charts

Router Ranker

Click for Router Ranker

NAS Charts

Click for NAS Charts

NAS Ranker

Click for NAS Ranker

More Tools

Click for More Tools

Wireless Reviews


The TEW-827DRU's admin GUI and feature set is similar to the A1900 class TEW-818DRU. Below is a screenshot taken from TEW-827DRU's emulator.

TRENDnet TEW-827DRU Landing page

TRENDnet TEW-827DRU Landing page

A key difference between the Broadcom-based TEW-818DRU and QCA-based TEW-827DRU is QoS. The 827DRU includes Qualcomm's StreamBoost automatic Traffic Shaping. Qualcomm's StreamBoost doesn't let you set rules for specific services. You can only specify relative device priority; StreamBoost automatically analyzes traffic types and prioritizes real-time traffic (streaming, gaming) higher than things like file tranfers and web browsing

TRENDnet TEW-827DRU StreamBoost

TRENDnet TEW-827DRU StreamBoost

On the TEW-818DRU, you'll find QoS under the Advanced Setup settings. Broadcom's QoS is priority based with five levels, with separate controls for both up and download internet traffic. You can manually create QoS rules based on IP address, protocol and port.



Table 2 summarizes some of the differences I discovered in going through the UI on the two routers. I also noticed some minor menu rearrangements. If you want to drill down and find some more differences, there's also an emulator for the TEW-818DRU.

Inbound IP Filtering X
Multicast to Unicast converter X
MU-MIMO Beamforming X
Multiple SSIDs per band 1 2
Simplified WPS setup X
Station List X
Qualcomm StreamBoost X
Granular QOS control X
Table 2: Feature differences

Storage Performance

The summary graphic below from the Router Charts shows all 4x4 routers—both AC2350 / 2400 and AC2600—we've tested with our standard procedure with USB 3.0 connections and NTFS drive format.The Linksys EA8500 remains the storage performance champ among all 4x4 routers we've tested for NTFS read, but cedes that title to the NETGEAR R7500V2 for NTFS write.

The TEW-827DRU turned the poorest performance of any of the routers in this group, with a measly 6 MB/s write and only 36 MB/s read.

We were not able to get FAT32 tests to run. FAT32 writes failed after six files were transferred, with throughput dropping to zero after that. We tried multiple times, rebooting both the router and testbed computer between subsequent attempts. We also retried the test using a WD My Passport Ultra USB 3.0 drive, without success.

Storage Performance Comparison - USB 3.0 / NTFS

Storage Performance Comparison - USB 3.0 / NTFS

Routing Performance

Routing throughput was measured using our standard router test process with the router loaded with 1.00b011 (1.00 17 Nov 2015) firmware. Table 3 summarizes the results and includes the TP-LINK Archer C2600, Linksys EA8500 and Amped Wireless RTA2600 for comparison.

Although the numbers are slightly different, you'd find all four pretty much the same in real-world use. Even the Amped's lower maximum simultaneous connections value wouldn't be noticed.

Test Description TRENDnet TEW-827DRU TP-LINK C2600 Amped RTA2600 Linksys EA8500
WAN - LAN 716 757 613 702
LAN - WAN 792 800 711 805
Total Simultaneous 1431 1416 734 1493
Maximum Simultaneous Connections 27,421 31,784 16,340 35,320
Firmware Version 1.00b011 (1.00 17 Nov 2015) 1.1.2 Build 20150924 Rel. 66045 1.43
Table 3: Routing Throughput

The IxChariot unidirectional composite plot for the C2600 shows the cyclical throughput variation experienced when testing routers capable of maxing out a Gigabit Ethernet connection.

TRENDnet TEW-827DRU routing throughput unidirectional summary

TRENDnet TEW-827DRU routing throughput unidirectional summary

The simultaneous up/downlink benchmark plot shows the usual jump near the start due to IxChariot's Nagle's algorithm implementation. Once that settles down, the throughput is stable for awhile, then downlink drops after the 50 second mark. Uplink is generally higher than downlink.

TRENDnet TEW-827DRU routing throughput bidirectional summary

TRENDnet TEW-827DRU routing throughput bidirectional summary

More Wireless

Wi-Fi System Tools
Check out our Wi-Fi System Charts, Ranker and Finder!

Support Us!

If you like what we do and want to thank us, just buy something on Amazon. We'll get a small commission on anything you buy. Thanks!

Over In The Forums

I purchased an AC86U router in late December 2019. In the first few days, the 5GHz signal dropped and a reset immediately fixed it. To make it less li...
i recently Picked up the netgear nighthawk ax12 (rax120). i have been pretty much an asus guy forever but after having many issues with my old router ...
Hey friends,I have a server (mac mini 2014) that runs 5 services, of which 2 need VPN, and the other 3 need internet access. Because my VPN doesn't su...
View attachment 20982 ​ Internet routers running the Tomato alternative firmware are under active attack by a self-propagating exploit that searches ...
So wondering if someone can explain this to me. Dug around on the site a bit but didn't see anything. If there's already a post about this, please poi...

Don't Miss These

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3