Like every other website on the planet, SmallNetBuilder uses cookies. Our cookies track login status, but we only allow admins to log in anyway, so those don't apply to you. Any other cookies you pick up during your visit come from advertisers, which we don't control.
If you continue to use the site, you agree to tolerate our use of cookies. Thank you!

Router Charts

Click for Router Charts

Router Ranker

Click for Router Ranker

NAS Charts

Click for NAS Charts

NAS Ranker

Click for NAS Ranker

More Tools

Click for More Tools

Wireless Reviews

Wireless Performance - more

The throughput vs. attenuation plots show these four routers are more alike than different. This is the case in even the 2.4 GHz band, where performance tends to fall apart.

2.4 GHz downlink has the D-Link tracking right with the ASUS and Linksys; only the NETGEAR stands apart.

2.4 GHz Downlink Throughput vs. Attenuation

2.4 GHz Downlink Throughput vs. Attenuation

The NETGEAR again tracks the lowest for 2.4 GHz uplink. But the difference among these products is so small, it's doubful you'd see it in actual use.

2.4 GHz Uplink Throughput vs. Attenuation

2.4 GHz Uplink Throughput vs. Attenuation

All four products again track pretty closely for 5 GHz downlink. But this time the D-Link takes the low road for most of the benchmark run.

5 GHz Downlink Throughput vs. Attenuation

5 GHz Downlink Throughput vs. Attenuation

Same goes for 5 GHz uplink, but the difference is still pretty minor.

5 GHz Uplink Throughput vs. Attenuation

5 GHz Uplink Throughput vs. Attenuation

My conclusion is the same as in the EA9500 review. In all, the performance of these AC5300 routers is as similar as I've seen. I don't see a reason to recommend one over another on the basis of wireless performance.

Maximum Wireless Throughput

We now use the Ixia Veriwave to test maximum wireless throughput. Note the Veriwave does not support non-standard modulation, which includes 1024 QAM in 5 GHz and 256 and 1024 QAM in 2.4 GHz. So these results represent the equivalent of testing with an AC2350 class wireless bridge with maximum link rates of 600 Mbps in 2.4 GHz and 1733 Mbps in 5 GHz. The results posted are an average of 10 one minute test runs. The results posted are an average of 10 one minute test runs. 40 MHz bandwidth is used for the 2.4 GHz test; 80 MHz for the 5 GHz.

2.4 GHz results show the D-Link having significantly lower throughput in both directions. Note maximum theoretical throughput reported by the Veriwave for these tests (both up and downlink) is 451 Mbps. Note also I had to lower MCS rates to MCS29 for downlink and MCS28 for uplink from the maximum MCS31 to get the tests to run.

2.4 GHz Maximum Wireless Throughput comparison

2.4 GHz Maximum Wireless Throughput comparison

The DIR-895L/R has mixed results for 5 GHz maximum throughput with downlink at 736 Mbps beating only the much-lower Linksys at 588 Mbps. But the D-Link dropped below the Linksys to rest in the bottom spot at 554 Mbps. The NETGEAR R8500 turns in the top performance for both benchmarks.

5 GHz Maximum Wireless Throughput comparison

5 GHz Maximum Wireless Throughput comparison

Note the MCS rate had to be dropped from the maximum MCS9 down to MCS5 to get the tests to run for the DIR-895L/R. However, I had to run the test on Channel 153 with the NETGEAR; it would not connect using Channel 40.

Why No Router Ranking?

With the major changes to our router test methodology, the ranking criteria also must change. Unfortunately, the current version of the Ranker supports only one set of ranking criteria per product class. We're hard at work on a completely revamped Charts system that will support multiple sets of ranking criteria and test data that will make everything right again. Please bear with us in the meantime.

More Wireless

Wi-Fi System Tools
Check out our Wi-Fi System Charts, Ranker and Finder!

Support Us!

If you like what we do and want to thank us, just buy something on Amazon. We'll get a small commission on anything you buy. Thanks!

Over In The Forums

I want to allow iPhone on eth5, to access http server in IOT(ESP32) on isolated wl0.1. Testing with dedicated RT-AC86U(384.14_2), chained WAN to LAN ...
After years of service i'm figuring out that it's time to replace my RT-AC87U + RP-AC68U combo, i have a large house and need to have both a good wire...
The ac class wireless works great, but I have more and more problems getting older devices that don't have ac to have reliable wifi connections. Shoul...
This is something that I haven't quite found a full clarification on. Regarding NAT Acceleration > LAN speeds. My ISP provides 60/20 so, in theory, I ...
I'm thinking of adding a second node. I already have two RT-AC86U and I also have a RT-AC68U. When I added the 2nd node, I looked at the Network Map a...

Don't Miss These

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3