Like every other website on the planet, SmallNetBuilder uses cookies. Our cookies track login status, but we only allow admins to log in anyway, so those don't apply to you. Any other cookies you pick up during your visit come from advertisers, which we don't control.
If you continue to use the site, you agree to tolerate our use of cookies. Thank you!

Wi-Fi Router Charts

Click for Wi-Fi Router Charts

Mesh System Charts

Click for Wi-Fi Mesh System Charts

MSI Wind U100

Which brings me to today. The market has moved at a pretty fast pace this year and blossomed into the "netbook" category. Screen sizes have moved from 7 through 8.9 to 10 inches as the current sweet spot and XP Home has replaced Linux as the OS of choice for many buyers.

MSI Wind U100

Figure 2: MSI Wind U100

The 10 inch screen has widened the netbook form factor so that the keyboard has been able to move from barely hunt-and-peckable to 91 / 92% of full-size that can allegedly support touch typing after a short period of adjustment. And the combination of 1024 X 600 screen resolution and 10 inch LCD panel is also supposed to make for a very comfortably-read display.

So since netbooks have evolved to the point where they are at least potentially capable of meeting my requirements, it was time to take the plunge. After checking reviews at LaptopMag and reading Brad Linder's Liliputing for the past month or so, I ordered a MSI Wind (U100-432US to be exact).

Figure 3 shows the U100 and Fujitsu P7120 that I'm trying to replace. The two are surprisingly similar in form factor and weight. Keep in mind, however, that the Fujitsu includes an CD/DVD drive while the MSI does not.

Fujitsu P7120 and MSI U100 Wind
Click to enlarge image

Figure 3: Fujitsu P7120 and MSI U100 Wind

You can't tell build quality very well from the picture, but the Fujitsu is more nicely put together and has a more solid feel. Not to say that the MSI comes across as cheap goods; on the contrary, it's actually very nicely made and doesn't feel like an inexpensive machine at all.

Figure 4 shows the Wind's keyboard, which is very similar to the Fujitsu's. The main difference is in the bottom row. The Fujitsu pushes the arrow keys down so that the period, comma and slash keys are the same size as the alpha keys in the row. But the MSI did not push the cursor keys down, so narrows the same keys.

MSI Wind keyboard
Click to enlarge image

Figure 4: MSI Wind keyboard

Typing on both machines felt very similar. Both required that I carefully position my fingers on the home row before starting to type. But after doing so, I have to say that my error rate was about the same as on a full-sized keyboard.

One major difference in the Fujitsu and MSI, however, is the trackpad and mouse buttons. The MSI's trackpad was frankly, flaky. I frequently experienced random cursor jumps and page scrolling was very touchy. Part of this could be due to the "tap to click" function that is enabled on the MSI's trackpad, which I could find no way to disable.

This thread in the MSI Wind Forums indicate this is due to MSI switching to using a trackpad from Sentelic instead of Synaptics. I didn't try the suggested drivers yet, because I found that the trackpad buttons were even more of an annoyance.

Perhaps it's my hand position, but I found the buttons hard to press and requiring exact thumb placement toward the outer edge of the button bar. I suspect part of this is the rocker action required by the single-piece "button" vs. more independent operation allowed by two independent buttons. For me, even more than the flaky trackpad, this is a real deal-killer.

If I were to keep the U100 (or probably any other netbook) I suppose that I would get a decent Bluetooth mouse and use it for extended writing sessions. But I couldn't get used to the balky mouse buttons;my thumb just didn't want to assume the correct position for a comfortable click.

In Use

Not-so-great trackpad and mouse buttons withstanding, I forged ahead with using the U100 for only short periods of time. Here are some other things that I found:

  • Contrary to the description on and some other etailers, the U100 does not have a gigabit NIC, only 10/100. My U100 has a Realtek RTL8102E 10/100 NIC. PCIe it is, but gigabit it is not.
  • The draft 11n WLAN is provided by a mini PCIe card using a Ralink 1T2R chipset. I didn't do any extensive range testing with it. But I found that it reported a Low signal strength (two bars) while sitting side-by-side with the Fujitsu, which reported Excellent signal strength (5 bars).
  • Web video playback was jerky unless I switched from the Max Battery power scheme which came set by default to one ("Always On" works) that allowed the Atom CPU to run at its maximum 1.6 GHz rate instead of 800 MHz.
  • The 1024 x 600 screen was very readable and a nice change from the Fujitsu's higher-resolution display. The main downside is that I had to do more up and down scrolling, which was annoying due to the flaky trackpad.
  • The larger 6 cell battery does add some heft to the U100. It protrudes below the bottom, raising up the rear and slanting the keyboard. I didn't find that the slant helped my typing much.


The U100 is surprisingly good for a $500 ultra-portable notebook and has a lot of features packed into its small frame. But I don't think it's a keeper, mainly due to the trackpad and mouse buttons. Besides, I think I need to play the field a bit before settling in with my long-term mate. So, the U100 will go back to the store (along with a 15% restock fee).

Next up, the supposedly best-in-breed 10 inch netbook—the Samsung NC10.

Support Us!

If you like what we do and want to thank us, just buy something on Amazon. We'll get a small commission on anything you buy. Thanks!

Don't Miss These

  • 1
  • 2