Like every other website on the planet, SmallNetBuilder uses cookies. Our cookies track login status, but we only allow admins to log in anyway, so those don't apply to you. Any other cookies you pick up during your visit come from advertisers, which we don't control.
If you continue to use the site, you agree to tolerate our use of cookies. Thank you!

Wi-Fi Router Charts

Click for Wi-Fi Router Charts

Mesh System Charts

Click for Wi-Fi Mesh System Charts

Super-G vs. Broadcom 11g - Streaming

Super-G vs. Broadcom 11g testing consisted of taking the previous scenarios and repeating them with the Atheros-based NETGEAR pair now set to Super-G mode.

The full implementation of Super-G has both static and dynamic modes. Among the differences are that static mode devices will only talk to other Super-G devices and channel bonding is always kicked in.

Dynamic mode in an AP lets 802.11b, 11g, and Super-G STAs all associate and transfer data and switches in channel bonding only when bandwidth demands require it.

Although NETGEAR's WG511T and WGT624 have been shipping with only static Super-G capability, NETGEAR recently posted BETA dynamic Super-G code. I tried both and found little difference when running the streaming and throughput scripts, so opted to use the more recent dynamic Super-G for my testing.

First up were the streaming vs. streaming tests.

The setup:

  • Atheros-based test pair set to dynamic Super-G
  • Broadcom-based 11g test pair on channel 11
  • 2.048Mbps, UDP NetMtgv.scr running on both WLANs
  • 10 feet maximum between WLANs (both APs and STAs)
  • Broadcom-based WLAN started first, followed by Super-G-based WLAN 10 seconds later.
  • Data sent from STA to AP

Once again the throughput plot isn't very informative, so I've only shown it in Figure 18 for the 10 foot test. At 0.051%, Lost Data in the 11g stream is a little higher than the 0.041% shown in Figure 10, but, once again, doesn't represent significant performance degradation.

Figures 20 and 21 show Lost Data at 30 feet and 50 feet, coming in at 0.038% in both cases.

Conclusion:
A nearby Super-G WLAN running a 2Mbps video stream will probably not cause significant interference to an 11g WLAN that's also streaming a video.

Throughput for Atheros Super-G vs Broadcom 11g - 2Mbps streams - 10ft

Figure 18: Throughput for Atheros Super-G vs Broadcom 11g - 2Mbps streams - 10ft
(click on the image for a full-sized view)

Lost Data % for Atheros Super-G vs Broadcom 11g - 2Mbps streams - 10ft

Figure 19: Lost Data % for Atheros Super-G vs Broadcom 11g - 2Mbps streams - 10ft
(click on the image for a full-sized view)

Lost Data % for Atheros Super-G vs Broadcom 11g - 2Mbps streams - 30ft

Figure 20: Lost Data % for Atheros Super-G vs Broadcom 11g - 2Mbps streams - 30ft
(click on the image for a full-sized view)

Lost Data % for Atheros Super-G vs Broadcom 11g - 2Mbps streams - 50ft

Figure 21: Lost Data % for Atheros Super-G vs Broadcom 11g - 2Mbps streams - 50ft
(click on the image for a full-sized view)

Support Us!

If you like what we do and want to thank us, just buy something on Amazon. We'll get a small commission on anything you buy. Thanks!

Don't Miss These

  • 1
  • 2