Like every other website on the planet, SmallNetBuilder uses cookies. Our cookies track login status, but we only allow admins to log in anyway, so those don't apply to you. Any other cookies you pick up during your visit come from advertisers, which we don't control.
If you continue to use the site, you agree to tolerate our use of cookies. Thank you!

Wi-Fi Router Charts

Click for Wi-Fi Router Charts

Mesh System Charts

Click for Wi-Fi Mesh System Charts

Wireless Performance

The Archer C3150 was tested with our Revision 9 wireless test process with 0.9.1 0.1 v005f.0 Build 160707 Rel.64418n version firmware loaded. Channel 6 and 20 MHz B/W mode was set for 2.4 GHz and Channel 40 and 80 MHz B/W mode was set for 5 GHz. The router was positioned in the test chamber as shown in the photo below. Note I propped up the rear of the router to bring the antennas into a straight-up vertical plane vs. their natural angled-back position.

TP-LINK Archer C3150 in test chamber

TP-LINK Archer C3150 in test chamber

The only other AC3100 / 3150 class router tested to date is the ASUS RT-AC88U. For fair comparison, I retested it with the V9 process and entered the data in the Charts.

The average 2.4 GHz throughput over all points measured is very similar in both downlink and uplink directions.

2.4 GHz average throughput comparison

2.4 GHz average throughput comparison

5 GHz averages show more significant differences in both directions, with advantage going to TP-LINK.

5 GHz average throughput comparison

5 GHz average throughput comparison

Throughput vs. attenuation plots provide a more detailed look at wireless performance. The 2.4 GHz downlink plot shows the two products tracking very closely until the ASUS diverges at 54 dB of attenuation and drops connection at 57 dB. The TP-LINK stays connected 6 dB longer, indicating slightly better range.

2.4 GHz Downlink Throughput vs. Attenuation

2.4 GHz Downlink Throughput vs. Attenuation

2.4 GHz uplink shows the two products closely tracking again, with a little separation starting at 30 dB of attenuation.

2.4 GHz Uplink Throughput vs. Attenuation

2.4 GHz Uplink Throughput vs. Attenuation

The 5 GHz downlink plots show similar profiles, but with the TP-LINK having generally higher throughput as signal levels drop (attenuation increases).

5 GHz Downlink Throughput vs. Attenuation

5 GHz Downlink Throughput vs. Attenuation

The C3150's throughput exceeds the ASUS' throughput most of the test range for 5 GHz uplink.

5 GHz Uplink Throughput vs. Attenuation

5 GHz Uplink Throughput vs. Attenuation

In all, these results show very similar performance in both bands, with the TP-LINK having a slight edge in 5 GHz.

Support Us!

If you like what we do and want to thank us, just buy something on Amazon. We'll get a small commission on anything you buy. Thanks!

Don't Miss These

  • 1
  • 2